ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to design, develop, and evaluate the performance of an atomized kerosene oven. The oven was developed to address the high operating costs, low thermal efficiency, and incomplete combustion associated with conventional kerosene ovens. It premixes atomized kerosene with steam in a 1:3 ratio to enhance atomization and improve air-fuel mixing, thereby promoting more complete combustion. Experimental evaluation methods for atomized kerosene stoves focus on determining their thermal efficiency, emission characteristics, and combustion quality, often comparing them with traditional wick stoves. The method includes the water boiling test (WBT), emission monitoring using flue gas analyzers, and pressure-controlled combustion testing. The oven comprises four main components: the oven chamber, kerosene tank, pressurized tank, and burner, with volumes of 338611 cm3, 59582 cm3, 884122 cm3, and 2061 cm3, respectively. The oven is medium-sized and intended for domestic use. The oven can bake 30 loaves of bread, each with an area of 120 cm2, within 35 minutes. The production cost was N117,441.00 (approximately $87.316). The operating temperature ranges from 180°C to 322°C. Based on the general energy equation, the oven generated 875.237 kJ of energy comparing it with traditional oven which has 675kj of energy and the operating temperature ranges from 150 oC to 250 oC respectively. Performance testing confirmed that the oven functions efficiently. It produces a stable blue flame with minimal soot, reduces fuel consumption, enhances heat transfer, and offers a cost-effective and cleaner baking solution, particularly in low-resource settings.
REFERENCES
Garipov, M. D., Zinnatullin, R. F., Melkov, A. A., Khalilov, E. M., Shayakhmetov, V. A., & Gobyzov, O. A. (2025). Experimental study of aviation kerosene atomization by means of the compressed-air injection system with high pressure. Thermophysics and Aeromechanics, 31(5), 967–982. https://doi.org/10.1134/S086986432405007X
Gujba, H., Mulugetta, Y., & Azapagic, A. (2015). The household cooking sector in Nigeria: Environmental and economic sustainability assessment. Resources, 4(2), 412-433. https://doi. org/10.3390/resources4020412
Gyan, S. S., Niraj, K. M., Muthukumar, P., & Monikankana, S. (2025). Thermal performance and emission analysis of self-aspirated kerosene pressure stove with porous radiant burner using nanofuels. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 20.
Ibrahim, L. A., Elzallat, A. M., Elsakka, M. M., Farag, T. M., & Gad, H. M. (2024). Effect of atomizing gas type on kerosene spray combustion using gas-blast atomizer: A comparative numerical study. Applied Thermal Engineering, 239, Article 121996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. applthermaleng.2023.121996
Johnson, A. O., Oluwakemi, A., & Ojo, A. O. (2021). Households’ energy choice pattern for cooking in Ado Ekiti South West Nigeria. Green Reports, 2(4), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.36686/ Ariviyal.GR.2021.02.04.016
Layeni, A. T., Nwaokocha, C. N., Adebayo, K., Ochibe, E., & Yusuf, R. (2016). Design and fabrication of a palm oil pressure stove. International Journal of Energy, Environment & Economics, 24(1), 131–146.
Lefebvre, A. H. (1980). Air blast atomization. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 3(4), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(80)90017-9
Manhiça, F. A., Lucas, C., & Richards, T. (2012). Wood consumption and analysis of the bread baking process in wood-fired bakery ovens. Applied Thermal Engineering, 47, 63–72. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.03.007
Moh, K. D. (2010). The design and construction of a portable kerosene pressure-cooker. African Research Review, 4(2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v4i2.58285
Muneer, S. E. T., & Mohamed, E. W. M. (2003). Adoption of biomass improved cookstoves in a patriarchal society: An example from Sudan. Science of the Total Environment, 307(1–3), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00541-7
Ogundahunsi, O. E., Olaoye, I. O., & Fabunmi, P. A. (2024). Determination of thermal efficiency and fuel consumption rate of a pressure cooker fueled with blends of waste vegetable oil and kerosene. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(6), 1033–1038. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i6.1033-1038.6319
Onakoya, A. B., Onakoya, A. O., Jimi-Salami, O. A., & Odedairo, B. O. B. O. (2023). Energy consumption and Nigerian economic growth: An empirical analysis. European Scientific Journal, 9(4), 25–40.
Pande, M. Y., Patil, S., Desale, K., Rajput, G., Warke, K., & Patil, A. (2017). Experimental investigation on pressure stove with different blends of fuel. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 14(4), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-1404016168
Romieu, I., Riojas-Rodríguez, H., Marrón-Mares, A. T., Schilmann, A., Pérez-Padilla, R., & Masera, O. (2009). Improved biomass stove intervention in rural Mexico: impact on the respiratory health of women. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 180(7), 649–656. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200810-1556OC
Sambo, A. S. (2009). Strategic developments in renewable energy in Nigeria. International Association for Energy Economics Newsletter, 3rd Quarter, 15–19.
Sharma, M., Mahanta, P., & Mishra, S. C. (2011). An experimental investigation on efficiency improvement of a conventional kerosene pressure stove. International Journal on Energy for Clean Environment, 12(1), 79–93.
Smith, K. R., Uma, R., Kishore, V. V. N., Zhang, J., Joshi, V., & Khalil, M. A. K. (2000). Greenhouse implications of household stoves: An analysis for India. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.741
Makonese, T., Pemberton-Pigott, C., Robinson, J., Kimemia, D., & Annegarn, H. (2012). Performance evaluation and emission characterisation of three kerosene stoves using a heterogeneous stove testing protocol (HTP). Energy for Sustainable Development, 16(3), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2012.06.002
Zhang, J., & Datta, A. K. (2006). Mathematical modeling of bread baking process. Journal of Food Engineering, 75(1), 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.058